No you leave it on in the shower.

White chocolate is literally the stuff they remove from raw chocolate to make chocolate taste good.

It’s like eating the husk and cob of an ear of corn.

Russia and the US are involved because the other half of the UNs existence is to keep them both from nuking shit.

Fruit on flour-based shortcake: Drake yes

Fruit on flour-based pasta: Drake no

Burning down Twitter has definitely been useful.

Someone fucked these up badly and there’s no way to tell from this how.

Are the numbers swapped between candidates but the sizes correct? Are the sizes swapped between candidates and the numbers correct?

As an aside, this is why serious data people don’t use pie charts. They’re terrible for lots of reasons, one being it’s very hard to compare areas instead of lengths, like a bar chart, as demonstrated by how many people didn’t notice these were so bad at first.

If you see data presented in a pie chart you should immediately be suspicious that it’s dishonest or incompetent.

None of that is to take away that voting for third parties this election is a terrible move - just saying this chart is useless.

Half the time it’s not even normal sugar; it’s high-fructose corn syrup…

EDIT: Well over half the time.

Obviously implied? So there’s nothing in my comment that directly contradicts that and will make you look really silly in a moment?

It’s better for making asphalt than gasoline and the US just buys it from Canada anyway.

This will come as an absolute shock to you. You can vote for someone you criticize…

Which party was it that dogpiles on anyone that dares criticize their shitty candidates again?

The point of saying it before the election is that the expectations are set.

Yes. Exactly! The reason people keep bitching about Harris and genocide is because they hope something might actually happen about it.

Biden was an absolutely terrible candidate (that I was going to vote for) and probably the only person who could lose against Trump. Because people constantly bitched about how bad he was they changed the candidate.

Harris doesn’t get to use Trump as a not-as-bad-as screen, and given that we don’t have the option of not voting for her, everyone should be applying every other available form of pressure to discourage her from enabling genocide or otherwise maintaining the status quo.

Somehow people think that pointing out that anyone who isn’t Trump are pro-genocide means that Trump somehow isn’t pro-genocide.

Like you’re not allowed to think about two problems at once. Or that there are no other options…

I didn’t expect this at all and am deeply hurt.

I really thought the handpicked second most powerful person in the country would differ significantly in policies from the people who handpicked her.

Missed opportunity for “No one can hear you croak”

Chat censoring should be mostly on the user side with user controlled blacklists and whitelists, with moderator involvement mostly for circumventing the filters.

Don’t want to see “penis”? Put it on your own blacklist.

Because their plan at the time was to allow (or assist) him to be propped up under the belief Clinton would then be a shoo-in. Which is a completely moronic strategy because if you lose you’re absolutely fucked.

They probably never want to actually keep him from being a candidate because it means their candidates just need to meet the barest of minimums to be viable.

You clearly demonstrated that you didn’t actually read what I wrote and made knee-jerk reaction, then think I’m the one not reading?

You’re ignoring that Dems are using the same tactics you certainly bitched about Republicans doing then say others are ignoring reality and acting in bad faith?

Guess who never said not to vote democrat?

What are you smoking?

If you think it’s wrong for Dems to use the same tactics as Republicans then what the fuck are you bitching about?