On the surface. But, you’re being rhetorical, in the original sense of the word. You can link words together but fail to do logic. You’re doing duckspeak, quack quack

You’re just gatekeeping, not looking at what makes art that

You have no comprehension of relevance.

The early 20th century? I’d say physical philosophy would beg to differ, and do you see how you just killed your own argument by citing a time period? I think ideas don’t have value and that intellectual property stifles innovation. You had me in the first half, where I assumed you meant that people don’t just intuit new ideas from nowhere, then you cited a date and lost me.

Easy. Don’t work a job or pay rent. Anarchism already exists. It just exists in the crannies (like right in front of you) where other domineering primates don’t beat you with sticks or boss you around. You don’t fix the system. You ignore it.

As an artist, all y’all need to chill. The problem is capitalism, and it’s not like artists make a living anyway. Democratizing art opens up a lot of possibilities, you technophobes.

You really should catch up with the rest of us on leftist ideology. Also, realize that the scary picture in your head with no government is exactly the world we live in, today, while the government simply wages wars for corporations and keeps itself intact by commodifying human behavior.

Yes, calls to violence. I give no fucks about policy. My policy is that we should shoot cops in the face when we see them.

Hey, I might be able to become a Canadian refugee. Sweet

So, we don’t do government

This is refreshing to see after using reddit so long.

I’ve embraced existentialism. Finally found a definition of spituality I could digest and apply: “How you emotionally relate to the world.” Since then, I let my primitive, primate brain do things like feel jealousy and be wrong about things. Pretty freeing