Definitely nothing corrupt about this. Aside from the quid pro quo, that is.

They already signed that contract. This is just Israel attacking them anyway.

You know they’re not going to stop there, though…right? Just look at what they’re doing in Gaza. They’re going to “liberate Iran”, alright. But, they don’t care if they end up bombing women and children in the process.

Next, they’ll start targeting schools, because that’s where the Iranian government indoctrinates its children, and hospitals because that’s where they treat Iranian soldiers injured in Israeli attacks. See, folks? They’re just trying to help. /s

Yeah, well…I certainly didn’t detect any indication that he was planning on changing his direction, just because some farmers and service industry folks were upset about having their employees snatched off the job.

When people started acting like he was softening his approach, I went back and read it again, and still couldn’t understand why they thought that. It really sounded to me like he was saying, “too bad for you…things have to change”, not “I didn’t realize this would hurt you…I need to change”.

When I read the, “things are going to change” line…I assumed he was saying that his current policy of kidnapping workers was the change in question.

He kind of rolled it into the statement he was making about ending “Biden’s open borders policy”, so it kind of felt like he was saying, no more letting immigrants have any options for sanctuary within the system. That’s what’s going to change, from now on. No?

C’mon guys…everyone knows he prefers, “God Emperor”.

Israel has already attacked Iran.

So…just let him keep breaking the law until it reaches the Supreme Court? I thought they were supposed to pause his actions, pending appeal…not let him keep going.

They may not be able to prosecute him, but they can make him stop what he’s doing. Theoretically.

The US is doomed.

Wow. That’s sad. I feel bad for Germany.

Would that sentiment still hold if it was Germany that was attacked?

More like, to test whether the US will follow article 5.

When will Dems learn? they can’t win without the progressive vote

Fuck that! There’s way more MAGA voters than progressives. You gotta go where the numbers are. /s

“Procedural error”? As in, they accidentally allowed a progressive to win?

Maybe they aren’t including the time spent scrolling. It’s just the sphincter flexing moments that count.

Man, why are you even having this argument when you are this ignorant about what these terms mean?

Do you understand the difference between “lethal” and “non-lethal” in the context of basic crowd control tactics?

For that matter, do you understand the difference in classification between a “protest” and a “riot”?

And are you even aware of your rights in either of those scenarios, and what tactics the police are authorized to use?

Because if you don’t understand these concepts, then you are simply bullshitting your way through this conversation. And at this point, it really seems like that’s the case. If you do understand these concepts and are still making this argument, then you are being completely disingenuous.

As I said…if you aren’t going to argue in good faith, then what’s the point? You’re just pretending to be stupid, at this point.

Buddy, you’re the one not arguing in good faith, if you are saying that rubber bullets and live rounds are the same thing. If you don’t understand the difference between lethal and non-lethal ammunition, then you’re right…there is no point in talking about this any further.

That would be the definition of “law enforcement”…and that is illegal.