Neither Trump nor his campaign have direct ties, though many former officials and staffers contributed to the project.
So people he hired because of ideological alignment then writing the ideological thing is not a direct tie?
Neither Trump nor his campaign have direct ties, though many former officials and staffers contributed to the project.
So people he hired because of ideological alignment then writing the ideological thing is not a direct tie?
Nah, you are trying to salvage this situation by changing everything you meant. Suddenly you are trying to sanitize every reference you made to political ideology and try to dress up this as concern. Now you accuse everybody else of conspiracies and extrapolation when you used ‘suspicious’ (which has a very clear connotation about a malign or hidden background https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/suspicious) instead of ‘indicative’, ‘concerning’, ‘worrisome’, ‘troubling’. People can read, and they read ‘suspicious’ which along with your references to political ideology really says who is the one thinking about conspiracies.
People who turn conservative or less progressive don’t get into car accidents so if he did that’s unusual?
Yes it is, if you didn’t read the article and also know nothing about anything.
True, but it’s not the first time someone has that idea. Germany spent 2 decades appeasing Russia to try to integrate them, and america and NATO basically served their requests after the 2008 invasion of Georgia in an attempt to get them to behave and be a part of the gang. We already know that it means nothing to Putin, we don’t need to try this stuff again.
nah, every little step is good and this ‘perfection or nothing’ attitude is very damaging to anything, including the personal and collective fight for rights and privacy.
oh, sorry this the shitpost community, no need for me yo lecture. good joke then, yes it can be taxing sometimes. that sponge is literally me.
They can say whatever the fuck they want and it even would be funny af. But most of the people there and a significant chunk of voting people here in the west are going to believe it.
I don’t know the precise answer, but I do know this:
So form my point of view it would be almost as if we tried to include the sides of a ravine or gorge in the measure just because technically it is area space.
Sorry if I cannot give you an exact answer, but I wanted to comment because you raised an interesting point that made me think.
Cheers.