the Democratic National Committee will begin a multi-round election to choose its new chair. Former President Joe Bidenā€™s appointee, Jamie Harrison, is on his way out, and an array of party insiders and outsiders are competing to replace him.

The DNCā€™s 448 voting members include hundreds of Democrats elected and selected through state parties, along with smaller numbers of appointees, elected officials, and representatives from party groups like the Young Democrats of America. They will cast ballots for a new chair at a time when the Democratic Party itself is adrift, with no clear leader and no strategy for fighting the Trump agenda or regaining power. As one DNC member told me, ā€œThe DNC is not really talking about what went wrong and what we did wrong.ā€

In writing this piece, I reached out to 427 of the DNCā€™s 448 voting members and interviewed 19 of them. Those who spoke with me came from ideologically, geographically, and racially diverse backgrounds. They included Democrats from rural and urban communities, grassroots party members, elected officials, and party insiders and critics alike. Most agreed to speak on the condition their names wouldnā€™t be used.

What emerged from these conversations is a picture of a DNC that is built to be an undemocratic, top-down institution, unable to truly leverage the wisdom and guidance of the DNC members who hail from local and state networks across the country. This is especially true when those local and state members disagree with the DNCā€™s posture or strategic choices

Members said their meetings donā€™t feel like a place for participation or governance. They described these gatherings as a combination of party presentations and social time, as opposed to real debates or discussions. During Covid, for instance, one member said that meetings were held via web conference, with the chat function turned off. And while the potential for real decision-making can occur at the DNC committee level, ā€œcommittees are completely rigged, with the chair appointing whoever they want,ā€ one DNC member told me.

In some ways, the race for DNC chair has itself become a microcosm of this tension between money, transparency, and winning elections. Minnesota Democraticā€“Farmerā€“Labor Party Chair Ken Martin and Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler are considered the front-runners based on their declared, though likely inflated, DNC vote counts. But neither has disclosed how much money they have raised for their campaigns, who their donors are, or how much they have spent.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    21 days ago

    They were the organ for Glenn Greenwald, they were founded on the back of the Snowden revelations. He (Greenwald) ā€œsomehowā€ drifted into MAGAland and they booted him out in 2020.

    In February 2024,Ā The InterceptĀ laid off 16 staff members, one-third of its newsroom. In April 2024, the outlet firedĀ William Arkin andĀ Ken Klippenstein resigned in protest.

    . . . At launch, Omidyar pledged $250 million in funding. The non-profit arm of First Look Media budgeted $26 million in both 2017 and 2018, according to public filings, much allocated toĀ The Intercept. Top journalists received top dollar, with Greenwald being paid $500,000 in 2015.

    The InterceptĀ was awarded a grant of $3.25 million fromĀ Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of cryptocurrency exchangeĀ FTX. It had only received $500,000 when Bankman-Fried went bankrupt and the shortfall in funding ā€œwill leaveĀ The Interceptwith a significant hole in its budgetā€ according to its editor-in-chief.

    Omidyar ceased financial support in 2022. First Look Media offered a $14 million grant whenĀ The InterceptĀ spun off. In 2023, the CEO discussed a financial pivot to small donors and major gifts. Donations doubled from $488,000 to $876,000 from 2022 to 2023, but failed to meet expenses. As of April 2024,Ā The InterceptĀ was burning around $300,000 a month.

    I think of them as the leftist Vice to Jacobinā€™s Mother Jones.