Should a sitting president be shielded from prosecution? If so, does that create a precedent for unchecked authority? Let me know what you think.
Should a sitting president be shielded from prosecution? If so, does that create a precedent for unchecked authority? Let me know what you think.
I think you sound like the “just asking questions” crowd.
That said, no, absolutely not. And, duh, of course it’s a precedent for authoritarianism.
What are your answers?