• dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reflexively downvoting anyone conflating “both sides”, “enlightened centrists” etc. Whole system is a disaster and sick of people acting like the “oppression lite” party is off limits for criticism. Anyone who doesn’t just compromise their principles to go with the flow politically knows better.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If people who disapprove of fascism don’t vote, well then, we get fascism.

      Doesn’t matter if you think it’s not your fault; we still get fascism.

      Doesn’t matter if you say the whole system is a disaster; we still get fascism.

      Doesn’t matter if you pinky-swear to go punch a Nazi instead of voting; we still get fascism and you go to prison.

      I promise you, the fascists will show up and vote for fascism.

      Personally, my principles say “fascism is bad, let’s not have one of those” and I don’t believe in compromising on that.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, the classic “lesser of two evils” stance to justify an arbitrary formation of social support behind “literally anything better than the worst possible thing”. And in this context right now, actually being used to shut down all criticism of anything besides the “worst possible thing”. No awareness at all about all the other better alternatives. You could actually prove that this mentality drives the status quo further towards “fascism” or any other negative totalitarian outcome, because you’re specifically forbidding criticism of what’s going wrong with who you support.

        It is not a well thought-out stance.