No matter which sort you use (except for new), content is recommended to you by activity. Depending on the sort (active, hot, top) it uses a slightly different mixture of votes/comments/time since post to determine the order.

The only exception is scaled, which boosts a little bit midsized communities, but still doesnā€™t manage to improve visibility of niche ones.

If lemmy is to truly start having active hobbyist communities instead of being 95% lefty US politics, Shitposts, and some tech stuff, it needs a sort that takes into account the userā€™s engagement.

For example, if I upvote / comment often in a community, there should be an option to have posts from the community be boosted in my feed, even if itā€™s a tiny community.

Letā€™s say Iā€™m subscribed to !world@lemmy.world and !news@lemmy.world because I want to occasionally see news. However, Iā€™m also subscribed to a couple hundred other communities, some of them who donā€™t manage to get more than a couple upvotes on their biggest posts. And whenever I see them Iā€™m replying/upvoting because Iā€™m passionate about that topic.

My feed shouldnā€™t be 95% c/news and c/world because those are the most upvoted and commented. I shouldnā€™t have to scroll down hundreds of posts to find ā€œbigā€ posts in small communities I interact with at any opportunity I get.

Thatā€™s why I think it would be beneficial to lemmy if the sort/algorithm took into account your engagement in a way.

It doesnā€™t have to be complicated, you can have a single number ā€œengagement scoreā€ for every community calculated with a basic formula, and that number is used as a boost to the community.

Iā€™m aware that there are some examples of successful niche communities on lemmy. But thatā€™s mainly because either a significant chunk of the lemmy userbase is into that niche (letā€™s face it the lemmy community is not a representative sample of the world population, we tend to be very similar people), or because the posts on it are simplified image/video type posts which appeal to people who donā€™t know much about the subject.

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Thereā€™s plenty of communities where I have no interest in discussing things with the masses. I like smaller communities with thoughtful posters who care more about the subject matter than being heard. Thatā€™s the beauty of Lemmy. Not everything has to be perfect for everyone.

    • macroplastic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Engagement does not exclusively mean commenting or posting; voting is also engagement. If you just want to lurk, why have an account in the first place?

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        I didnā€™t say I wanted to lurk. Iā€™m just saying I find beehawā€™s Technology community more to my preference than LWā€™s

        • macroplastic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          Thatā€™s fair, I guess I just donā€™t see the connection to OP. From how you phrased this I assumed you were disagreeing.