• R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As opposed to taking up the whole spot? If you need the loading ramp you could still use the spot and just reverse if it’s on the side he’s taking up.

    Would you prefer he take the entire spot which his trike? Instead of potentially still letting someone park there? He’s taking up less space this way.

    • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then the handicap person can just find another spot that doesn’t have a tricycle parked beside it /s. “The handicap person needs to work around this tricycle driver” is totally opposite of accessibility.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you need the loading ramp you could still use the spot and just reverse if it’s on the side he’s taking up.

      Not if you can’t get into the vehicle in order to reverse it. There’s a reason they have protected width on both sides.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not if you can’t get into the vehicle in order to reverse it.

        Like… at home? Before you come to the store?

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No… at the store, where the parked vehicle is blocking your access.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            But you’d already be in your vehicle when you are parking, so you’d just park either forward or reverse to compensate for the trike.