At Apple’s secretive Global Police Summit at its Cupertino headquarters, cops from seven countries learned how to use a host of Apple products like the iPhone, Vision Pro and CarPlay for surveillance and policing work.

  • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not just clickbait, the title is maliciously wrong.

    The article is about Apple holding developers conferences with cops with the purpose of developing apps tailored to them, there’s nothing about users privacy.

    A business trying to enter a new market, what a weird concept eh?

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Took me several reads of the headline to start with.

      Then connecting it to the article contents, at least this is “accurate clickbait” (if there is such a thing). It actually describes what’s going on, we just interpret it differently initially because of current circumstance (which I suppose you could say is the fldefinition of clickbait).

      Still clickbait, but at least it’s not an outright lie like so many, just worded to make us want to click!

      I’m a bit chagrined to have been taken in by the extreme interpretation of the headline, when the milder interpretation (in a different climate) would be inoffensive.

      Ffs, how far have we come when I’m showing appreciation for a clickbait headline’s milder interpretation is accurate enough to not be a lie, but just attention-grabbing?

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    What exactly is the surveillance part of this article? So far it seemed like a normal application developer conference deal but the page reloaded and now I only get paywall. I found myself feeling rather unsurprised.

    Who would believe that a business as big as Apple wouldn’t comply with law enforcement requests in the first place? Of course they would when technically possible. They’re in the business of making money first, not defending you.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yep, the article is about Apple showing cops how to use the tech, what apps the police in other countries is using to support their daily work and the police evaluating the use of more Apple tech in their daily duty (Carplay, Vision, etc.).

      There’s nothing about spying on normal Apple users or Apple handing out your personal data to the cops in that article.

      Clickbait headline.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Once you get 3/4 through this article, and get to the actual content, it’s pretty underwhelming. Apple was basically just showing cops that they could be querying their existing databases with iOS mobile and or CarPlay experiences.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That website is complete trash. It won’t even scroll for me. It just shows the badge and that’s all. This is what happens when they’re constantly trying to enforce specific user actions rather than just building a working website.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s like when you have a simple blog that for some bizarre reason is a single page JavaScript web app.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This title seems kind of clickbaity. Most of the native apps are for querying existing government and police databases. We’re talking about accessing records via CarPlay, as opposed to using a bulky Window’s laptop docked in a center console.

    Apple is still not offering governments a backdoor into encrypted content.

  • goatmeal@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is about Apple helping build tools for policing. Not about giving over its customers data to police.

  • pacology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Privacy =!= Protection from legal action

    If you use your iPhone to conduct illicit business, the police can subpoena Apple and it will hand over your data (at least in the US).

    Privacy in this context means preventing other apps from selling your data to brokers (e.g., location data) or using your phone information to do other stuff (e.g., AI training).

  • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    It was just about time for this to be made public. It was like an open secret for everyone in the know.

    You can also add the fact that Apple blocks all ads and trackers… except their own.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Incredible how many people skip the article and substitute their own reality before commenting.

      Article says nothing about Apple allowing law enforcement access to any user data.

      There has always been plenty to criticize about Apple, but some of you people see their name and just get so [TRIGGERED]

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yep.

        I’d happily crap on them for being an e-waste factory, for making it insanely hard to install anything outside of their app store, etc.

        This ain’t it. This is nothing.

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What is the open secret? That Apple sells iPhones to the police? That’s what the article says…

      • mbirth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, finally, cops don’t need to go to an Apple store undercover or need to buy their iPhone on the black market.

        The secret is finally out!

        Cops use iPhones, too.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    Do people actually believe Apple’s hogwash about privacy?

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      After reading the article, it doesn’t look like any of this contradicts what they’re been selling. Encrypted data is still locked down. IMHO, this title is fairly clickbaity.

      A lot of this looks like iOS / CarPlay versions of policing / public records database software that was previously on platforms like Windows.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t assume they are perfect. But I do absolutely believe they are significantly better on privacy than any other major player in the smartphone space.

      Even if you don’t pay any attention to their policies and programs, the mere fact that iPhones aren’t running an OS owned by an advertising company should be enough to demonstrate this.

      • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree. And if you want some level of convenience and some level of privacy I think Apple is the way to go.

        For example I have the skills to use GrapheneOS but I just don’t want to deal with it and I want to still be able to use NFC payments. So iOS is the next best thing.

    • joewilliams007@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      it’s easier to just believe in it. these people are weak (regarding privacy). I am not saying privacy is number one priority in life. It is not.

  • Henry@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Try vote to disband police force? So you need to worry about this kind of things anymore :)