• rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yeah, that’s exactly the point! How do you think that a decentralized system is any different?!

    If everything is “decentralized”, you still must have a way to get rid of bad actors. Even nostr is set up in a way that you can not force your node into anyone else’s relay.

    Forgive my bluntness, but the more you try to argue you point the more it seems you have no clue what you are talking about. There are plenty of things to criticize about Lemmy and ActivityPub in general, but you are missing the mark on all of them.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Getting rid of bad actors is the job of the users (from their feed) and the mods (from the communities they moderate), no one should have the authority the admins have.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Admins still need to have control over what goes into the servers. If you are running a server and someone pushes content that is illegal in your jurisdiction, you can not go around asking users to please stop it for you.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, but you can delete the illegal content from your server and other server owners can do the same on their side.

          The way it works currently is no different for that, the person who controls the server can block IPs if they want.

          What I’m saying is that if some servers are ready to host your content then it’s the users’ and moderators’ decision to block it on their side.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            As a matter of governance, I agree with you: my instance is only blocking one instance and that’s because they got reported for hosting CSAM. As an admin, I believe that my users are mature enough and smart enough to know how to filter out what they want to see.

            But if you acknowledge that server admins can censor content on their servers, your complaint is only about the way that this is done, not the principle, and you agree that there needs to be an established hierarchy.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              They can block content on their server, but as long as one server hosts the content, it would be available to anyone who wants to see it, which isn’t how things work on Lemmy unless you want to sign up to a bunch of instances to make sure you have access to everything.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                If you just want to see the content, you don’t need an account. You can just pull the data, like opening up a different website.

                What you want is the ability for some other server to push content to a server that the admin might have chosen to say “no, I do not want to have data from them, and I do not want to have my resources used by these users”.