• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Even if it’s small, that still can matter in some elctions. Small changes in tight states can make a difference. Mind you in 2000, the presidental election came down to just 537 votes in florida

    Elections can be and often are won on the margins

    Edit: or also provide more state wins to make republicans trying to overide state results much more difficult

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Mind you in 2000, the presidental election came down to just 537 votes in florida

      And that this led to the Supreme Court deciding who would be president instead of the voters. They didn’t finish recounting. How do we think it would go for us if the Supreme Court decided who would be our next president this year?

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        As a discarded Florida voter in that election, thank you for speaking up on my behalf. And I still feel pretty shitty about that.

        Gore absolutely should’ve won— those hanging chads be damned!

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        The Brooks Brothers riot stopped the counting. Gore would have won. Thousands of votes were thrown out because they were black votes and some voters both punched their votes for Gore and wrote Gore’s name in. The riot was planned so that the Extreme Court would give Bush the election.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Alternatively, it could also provide small margins in additional states to make trickier harder. For instance a small with in north carolina and georgia would make republican plots against the elctions results more difficult

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, but only if they actually get counted. The problem in 2000 is that they didn’t. The count was close and the Supreme Court decided to end counting early. We really need this election to be not down to such small numbers or our current Supreme Court will fuck us.

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            My point is less that it should come down to that, and more that any smaller gain can matter if things do

            If you want to do something that it well known to increase turnout more significantly, I highly recommend volunteering for the campaign. Canavassing, for instance, can increase turnout by upwards of ~7-10% (or more or slightly less depending on the data you look at)

            Here’s one site with both in person and virtual places listed

            If nothing else, it can help turn the anxiety down a bit by taking action

              • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Fair enough, but worth mentioning that canvassing is not the only effective way to volunteer. There’s also text banking, phone banking, and post card writing for instance (can find those places on the earlier linked site)