Those close toĀ Donald Trump fear the former president āmay have legit PTSDā from the assassination attempt at a Pennsylvania rally last month.
Thatās according to aĀ Vanity FairĀ report published Wednesday that claimed those in Trumpās inner circle have noticed that heās become fixated on a seven-second clip that shows the moment he nearly lost his life.
āHeās been watching that seven-second clip of how close he was to getting shot right in the headāover and over and over again,ā said a Republican close to the campaign, reportedĀ Vanity Fair.
Well, the violence came from his side. Thatās how they roll. Expect more of it. They canāt stop. Be prepared.
They donāt see it that way. This is another āblack helicopterā thing where they just assume itās part of the CommieLib-MkUltra-Deepstate and that every piece of evidence that runs contrary to that narrative is so obviously manufactured by Nancy Pelosi using a 3D printed, Jewish-space-neuralizer organized by AOC to delete her feet pictures off the internet.
Itās clearly just aconspiracy to ruin the lives of the UberMerican loud minority of manly lifted truck driving estranged fathers wearing Izod Sport jackets with iron-on bald eagles and American flags.
If he were a real RepublicanĀ® ChristianĀ© Americanā¢, he wouldnāt have done a violence, but if he had, his aim would have been true, and and he would have gotten away.
If youāre talking about the assassination attempt, I donāt think we know which side the shooter was on. We only have remarks from classmates saying he was conservative and that his house (owned by his parents) had Trump signs. We also have a donation to progressives and a Google search for both Trump and Biden events. Thatās everything Iāve heard I think. It doesnāt paint a particularly clear message. It seemed more like someone trying to leave a mark in history with his suicide (who will only be remembered as the kid who missed, and also didnāt get into the shooting club because he was a dangerously bad shot), not a politically motivated assassin.
The attack on the capital, yeah for sure, and yeah weāll certainly see more of that.
the shooter was a right winger. we know this. it was not ideologically motivated, dude just wanted to do something āimportantā, and his right wing beliefs led him to believe shooting someone, which he was insecure about, was what he should do.
You can say we know it all you want. We really donāt. We can make assumptions, and we can hope for things that make us feel more secure in our beliefs, but it doesnāt actually create proof. What proof is there that I didnāt list that you must have? Saying āwe know thisā doesnāt make me any more confident. You must know more, right?
his social media accounts.
journalists have talked to people who knew him. he was like a center right dude, in the way stupid teens sometimes are.
the whole reason he decided to do this is because he got laughed off the schoolās rifle team for being bad, and was so upset about it he decided to try to kill an āimportantā person to prove it to them.
I think he said why? IDR the medium. I donāt super care. look it up.
why are you saying we donāt know? are you just now stumbling into the fundamental limits of knowledge and epistemological uncertainty and having an existential crisis and getting an urge to build a time machine so you can go back to when kurt godel was alive so you can MURDER HIM and never have to think about this again? are you okay? do you need a hug and an ice cream koan? can I help? not with the time machine; kurt godel is one of like three mathmeticians whose work I actually like,but, you know, with your feels?
I addressed everything you said, except for 4 which I donāt think exists as far as Iām aware. As for the rifle team thing, there are plenty of leftists who like to shoot guns. For example, I do.
Why Iām saying we donāt know is because the top comment made a claim that we do know. Why did it say that? Isnāt that the issue if someone is making a claim without it being backed up by evidence? I like that youāre making an attack on me as if Iām being emotional. I promise you Iām not. I just donāt appreciate people spreading false information. It can only work to undermine us if we make a false claim and itās proven false in the future. Letās just stick to what we know. Weāre on the right side. We donāt need lies.
plenty of people like to shoot guns. lefties, however, do not get butthurt because its a core part of our identities so when someone says āyouāre so bad at shooting we dont even trust you to point that thing in the right ~120 degree arc to not risk shooting at us, go awayā.
you addressed everything I said. soā¦ what IS up with you? lets go back to point 5. feels like thatās more what this is about.
I promise you there are lefties that would get pissed off if they were told they were a bad shot. Stop assuming everyone on the left is your perfect model of person. They arenāt. We can have issues too.
I addressed point 5 multiple times at this point I think. Pretending like we have information we donāt have leaves us in danger, and lying about information we donāt have makes our standing fragile. We have no need to lie because weāre on the right side.
Just be honest. The kid had conservative parents, supposedly expressed some conservative views to other students, wanted to join the gun club but was dangerous whole shooting so was denied, donated a small amount to a progressive fund, and searched for both Biden and Trump events. Thatās what we know (I think, unless more has come out). He obviously wasnāt a leftist, but he was a dumb teenager. I donāt know if he knew what he believed.
pissed? sure. āmurder someone about itā? unlikely. the things we get THAT upset about are entirely different.
okay but we do have information. I addressed that in points one and two. we do have information. I told you what information we have. so I return to point five, and wonder if you need a hug.
he searched for both biden and trump (and I think some others?) events because he didnāt care WHO he shot, just that it was important. the kid was a right winger, in specifically the way that children can be, and that motivated that he did a shooting, but not who he shot. correct. this is what I said originally.
that is what I meant by āin the way that kids areā