• hexi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Colleges act like Scientology in the states. Equating education with how much money you’ve handed them.

    Meanwhile anything can be learned online, but it counts for nothing because corporations treat purchases credentials as the only legitimate form of “education”.

    • Jim@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes, I’m sure the formal training received by doctors, nurses, lawyers, teachers, and engineers is just an over-hyped “education” that can all be replaced by online MOOCs.

      There are real problems with education, especially with the costs, but “anything can be learned online” is the worst take I’ve heard in a long while.

        • Jim@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just because you can get part of your education remotely or through self-learning didn’t mean “anything can be learned online”.

          And if you were hiring a math tutor for your kid, would you prefer a self-proclaimed expert from watching YouTube videos or would you want someone who got a degree from a credentialed university? And even if you don’t care, why are you surprised that others would be skeptical of the YouTube expert?

          Remote learning can be fine for some things, and self learning through informal channels are also fine, but it’s not a full on replacement for formal education in all cases.

      • Sinonatrix [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anything can be learned online, with enough drive and determination

        But if you’re that powerful: why bother learning from others? You could simply leave and create your own community called name’s Gulch.

        • Jim@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No sorry, that’s just fundamentally false. You can’t just learn titration techniques from watching a video. You can’t learn phlebotomy without an instructor watching you do it to a patient. Hell, you aren’t learning how to drive a car from playing a video game.

          And I’m not sure where you are pulling the “if you are that powerful” from. You really have an ax to grind don’t you.

  • ATQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Higher Ed in red states is at risk. Of course, that’s the outcome that red states vote for. Oh no! It’s the completely predictable consequences of our very own actions!

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      West Virginia was a reliable blue state until the 2000 election. Maybe if democrats focused on helping workers instead of bourgeois scum, they wouldn’t constantly be terrified (or even at risk) of losing elections?

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m fine with red states basically being the dumb manual labor slaves the US has always wanted.

      “Made in Oklahoma by children labor”

      Works for my blue-state-ass.

      VOTE!!

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hexbears need to be sure to explain “liberals” don’t mean left-wing, as it is commonly (and inaccurately) understood.

          • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Left-wing” is pretty vague. I’ve seen people say things like “now I’m as leftwing as they come, which is why I support sending tens of billions of dollars to Ukrainian Nazis! Slava Ukraini!” Under the capitalist mode of production, there are communists, liberals, and fascists. That’s pretty much it.

              • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not really. You either support capitalism or you don’t. And if you do support it, you’re either comfortable with its nastier aspects (genocide, slavery, the annihilation of the human species via climate change), as fascists are, or you find those aspects uncomfortable, as liberals do, though they aren’t an issue for you if they’re kept out of sight. Is there some other group I’m missing here?

                • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t like capitalism, but I’m not a communist. 🤷‍♂️ I must not exist.