• 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m surprised that there aren’t straight disqualifications for more than some number of grid places in terms fo penalties. Why not just straight up do a race ban?

    • SuperIce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s needlessly harsh for teams that have an unreliable PU. That’s why the penalty actually goes down for the second component over budget (5 spots for the ICE instead of 10).

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Why? What’s the incentive to do that? That’s how you get a sport where the teams besides managing their tires will baby their engines even more. It will just increase the gap between the top teams and bottom teams. It would make the sport boring to watch, and halfway the season multiple cars will be missing from the grid.

    • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      So one logical reason they even bother calling placements is because if both yuki and Max took replacements and upgrades that both would drop them to the back, who would really be at the back?

      On a different point, a bad PU maker can’t even be replaced until 2026. They’re locked into their makers by the FIA until then. So they can’t really change off redbull to say Ferrari until after next season.

      Imo let him start from the back, no big deal. We’ll get a good comparison of how well yuki in the vcarb can get through the field, if at all, compared to perez who will probably put himself out in q1 and attempt yet another recovery drive.

      Fun for all