Meanwhile, 44 percent backed the American tradition of competing branches of government as a model, if sometimes ā€œfrustrating,ā€ system.

Why would people want to live under an authoritarianā€™s thumb? Itā€™s rooted, experts say, in a psychological need for securityā€”real or perceivedā€”and a desire for conformity, a goal that becomes even more acute as the country undergoes dramatic demographic and social changes. People also like to obey a strong leader who will protect the groupā€”especially if it is the ā€œrightā€ group whose interests will be protected. Recall the Trump supporter who, during the 2019 government shutdown, complained, ā€œHeā€™s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.ā€

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      Maybe the citizens werenā€™t suffering but their massive slave population definitely was. Heck, the reason they trained so hard was to put down slave revolts.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        3 months ago

        Sure, but that wasnā€™t the question.

        There is no country, democratic or authoritarian, on this planet that currently doesnā€™t rely to some extent on exploited, indentured, or enslaved non-citizens, either domestic or abroad.

      • Soleos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        Well yeah, they asked for a simple example, I gave one. Whatā€™s wrong with that? The discussion is already in the realm of ā€œmilitary dictatorshipā€ which arenā€™t exactly known for respecting human rights/freedoms of non-citizena. The question was about the sustainability of such systems for those deemed citizens.