• Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Since when could someone do this in Photoshop with a couple of clicks and zero training, for free and on any device? Since when has Adobe specifically marketed Photoshop as a tool for creating sexually explicit images?

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Since when has Adobe specifically marketed Photoshop as a tool for creating sexually explicit images?

            • Ilandar@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              How is it a “strawman” when it relates specifically to the topic being discussed? A simple web search can bring up countless examples of generative AI tools that are designed to “undress” or “nudify” women. You seem to believe there is zero difference between using one of these sites and using Photoshop, so I am asking when Adobe marketed Photoshop as an undressing tool. The ease of use and access is the key difference here that you are trying to avoid acknowledging.

              • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                4 months ago

                My question was very simple and limited in scope:

                Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?

                I did not make any sweeping comments, and I would appreciate if you stopped trying to claim things on my behalf.

                • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  They didn’t use Photoshop, they used generative AI. Maybe you should spend a little less time trying to save face and a little more time thinking about why that might have been.