The quote:

ā€œGiven Joe Bidenā€™s incredible record, given Donald Trumpā€™s terrible record: he should be mopping the floor with Donald Trump. Joe Biden is running against a criminal. It should not be even close. And there is only one reason it is close. And that is the presidentā€™s age.ā€

  • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    You make reasonable points, but here are a couple light rebuttals which ultimately amount to my idea that the risks of replacing Biden outweigh the risks of keeping him on the ticket.

    Iā€™m skeptical of the candidate even having to set up a full campaign, because theyā€™ll have the name recognition already. If itā€™s the result of 5 debates between younger Democrats including Harris, that is going to be blasted on every news channel. Not to mention, a giant campaign isnā€™t exactly helping Biden. The negative press alone from them trying to shield him probably set him back enough that heā€™ll lose.

    Regarding the ads having already been reserved, I wonā€™t pretend to know how any of that works, but wouldnā€™t you think that would also hinder Trump? As all his ads would be toward Biden and not the candidate? He would somehow have to pivot his attacks. Harris is easier for Trump to attack, because heā€™s been doing it for years now, along with Fox News. Regardless, I donā€™t find much sway in that argument , just because Iā€™m not sure ads are really going to do much to swing moderate or independent voters.

    I donā€™t think the public is politically aware enough to realize Harris is the ā€œnext in line,ā€ as you infer, so I really donā€™t think theyā€™d be alienating black or female voters.

    (Side note: I think the whole idea of Harris being the one to be ā€œpassed overā€ is such a bullshit modern political take. Just like how it was Hillaryā€™s turn, or Bidenā€™s turn. That kinda shit is what got us here now, instead of choosing the best candidate we always seem to choose the one who should be, or who is due next. Really fucking frustrating.)

    Finally, the media is already having a feeding frenzy on Biden, a well-tested candidate with lots of experience. He is down in the polls in swing states, heā€™s getting grilled by his own party, and his numerous attempts of damage control have done little to assuage the concerns from congresspeople, but Iā€™d also guess voters, as well. Iā€™m sorry but I just donā€™t think Biden can beat Trump, and I think he should step aside for either Harris or, in my preference, let the DNC shake it out with some debates.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      I donā€™t think either us are wrong since weā€™re in unprecedented territory. Almost any scenario could happen. My main concern is that calling for a different candidate is easy and no one is addressing the hard parts of a campaign and building a winning coalition.

      The ad buys for September and October are probably just reserved at this point with content to come later. Thereā€™s probably lots of flexibility for presidential campaigns but, like any project, a last minute change with no new deadline will make it all worse.

      And whether we like it or not, plenty of people support Kamala Harris. And not just her. All the potential candidates. Weā€™re all imagining our fave will get the nod but only one will. People say Gavin Newsome but he had an affair with his campaign managerā€™s wife. How is that going to play with voters? No idea. Maybe Trump is so bad, itā€™s a footnote but maybe it makes enough suburbanites disgusted. I donā€™t know.

      • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I agree, although I suspect both of us are wrong rather than neither of us being wrong haha

        Gotcha about the ad buys though. Weā€™ll just have to see what happens I guess. Bottom line though, vote blue no matter who.