A center-left group in the U.S. sees a valuable lesson in the landslide victory of Britainā€™s Labour Party after nearly 15 years in the political wilderness.

The centrist Democrat think tank Third Way argues in a memo obtained Friday by POLITICO that Labourā€™s sweeping win shows that ā€œcentrism wins electionsā€ and can undercut right-wing populism by appealing to the broadest segment of the population with a credible platform.

  • āœŗroguetrickāœŗ@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    Now I understand this article is largely ragebait for this community, but I just wanted to point out that the incredible strength of this centrist approach resulted in one of the lowest turnout elections in 20 years with labour receiving about 34% of the popular vote.

    Not exactly a ringing endorsement for a consistently winning strategy.

    • jeffw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Turnout was low because people donā€™t vote when they already know the outcome. The last landslide in the UK also had low turnout.

      And while 34% is a few percentage points lower than other recent winners, the more centrist party, lib dems, got more votes than the previous election.

      • āœŗroguetrickāœŗ@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        And while 34% is a few percentage points lower than other recent winners, the more centrist party, lib dems, got more votes than the previous election.

        Sure, but Corbynā€™s labour got 32.2 and 40.0 compared to this 33.7 ā€œlandslide.ā€ And Corbyn won his seat even though heā€™s an independent. I donā€™t particularly find the centrist strategy to be a very compelling result compared to that.

          • āœŗroguetrickāœŗ@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            Ā·
            4 months ago

            You listen to the liberals backing laborā€™s change theyā€™ll say itā€™s because labor picked up Tory voters in key races while losing voters in ā€œsafeā€ races while cherry picking results to demonstrate.

            Iā€™ve yet to be convinced of that line of thinking though and Iā€™m much of the same opinion as you. Nobody elects a status quo party when shit is going south like it is right now. The Tories lost because they couldnā€™t help but put up shit policies. The neo-blairites will lose because they kept those shit policies.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        Shy tories voted for the Lib Demā€™s. The Lib Demā€™s arenā€™t some compromise between left and right. Thatā€™s doesnā€™t really work, it just means everyone dislikes you. The Lib Demā€™s get votes when the tories are too socially unacceptable to vote for.

        A Tory walks down the street, he encounters a homeless person. He chooses to kick the them, laughing as he walks away. The Lib Dem disgusted by this kicks the homeless person, then walks away quietly.