Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoJustice Department won't prosecute Garland for contempt, says refusal to provide audio wasn't crimeapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1225arrow-down16
arrow-up1219arrow-down1external-linkJustice Department won't prosecute Garland for contempt, says refusal to provide audio wasn't crimeapnews.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square56linkfedilink
minus-squareblazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year ago your whole point is that its in the constitution right? Yes. It is.
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThis is a you thing. If you want to learn more, read the wiki article.
minus-squareblazera@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoOh ive learned plenty. That the constitution has nothing in it to support common law.
This is a you thing. If you want to learn more, read the wiki article.
Oh ive learned plenty. That the constitution has nothing in it to support common law.
Good for you, champ!