You may have noticed a distinct lack of return2ozma. This is due to their admitting, in a public comment, that their engagement here is in bad faith:

I’m sure there will be questions, let me see if I can address the most obvious ones:

  1. Can I still post negative stuff about Biden?

Absolutely! We have zero interest in running an echo chamber. However, if ALL you’re posting is negative, you may want to re-think your priorities. You get out of the world what you put into it and all that.

  1. Why now?

Presumption of innocence. It may be my own fault, but I do try to think the best of people, and even though they were posting negative articles, they weren’t necessarily WRONG. Biden’s poll numbers, particularly in minority demographics ARE in the shitter. They are starting to get better, but he still has a hell of a hill to climb.

  1. Why a 30 day temp ban and not a permanent ban?

The articles return2ozma shared weren’t bad, faked, or from some wing-nut bias site like “beforeitsnews.com”, they were legitimate articles from established and respected news agencies, pointing out the valid problems Biden faces.

The problem was ONLY posting the negatives, over and over and then openly admitting that dishonest enagement is their purpose.

Had they all been bullshit articles? It would not have taken anywhere near this much time to lay the ban and it would have been permanent.

30 days seems enough time for them to re-think their strategery and come back to engage honestly.

tl;dr - https://youtu.be/C6BYzLIqKB8#t=7s

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    He admitted to me, after I accused him, that he searches a news aggregator for “Biden” daily and posts the negative stuff he sees. I believe he said it was to hold dems accountable or something. That exchange was maybe a month or two back and might have been either here or on !news@lemmy.world

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Let’s go with that example. If you posted multiple times per day about puppy mills on a community about animals, that would be a bit much. I post multiple posts about Trump per day but its generally reflective of overall media coverage. I just go to my preferred sources and browse their home pages for news that seems interesting. I don’t seek out anything in particular.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Ok, so if Biden is a puppy mill, is Trump the kill shelter?

        And then this guy is PETA, working at kill shelters while posting negative stuff about puppy mills?

        If your goal is to fuel a distorted view about the competing candidates then that is bad faith.

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d love to one day, see just ONE of you people offer up a good argument that’s relevant to the topic.