• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Media library apps have been doing this kind of stuff forever. An index of the files + metadata allows for a better and more performant experience. But, if an entry in the DB gets pooched, file remains on the drive and is hidden from the user.

    Many media library apps actually have a way to repair and or rebuild the library DB if it gets out of sync or corrupted. iTunes straight up put that feature in the menu bar. The Photos app will do it if you launch the app while holding command-option.

    Back when iPods were king, how many of us had old music come back to life after a fucked up iTunes library was rebuilt? It’s kind of a similar issue.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sure, an index makes sense for quick search, but I’m confused why deleting it wouldn’t remove it from the filesystem too

      Is that why iPhones seem to have no idea how much disk space they’re using?

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Given the rarity of this, it could’ve just been the normal random stuff that happens in computer land. Requests that don’t complete because they were interrupted by a crash, the rare bad block, etc. Or maybe it was just a bug that occasionally reared its head under certain circumstances.

        Whatever it was, it wasn’t the first time a piece of software had an index that was messed up and out of sync with the stored files.

        As for the iPhone storage thing you mentioned, I don’t know what you’re talking about. There was a IOS 17 bug early on where people mentioned that the OS needed a restart to claw back space from temporary install files and caches.

        That said, the corrupted DB we’re talking about appears specific to the photos app. It’s not the file system index. It’s basically a glorified preference file.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          E.g. iCloud says it’s using 13.4 GiB to store photos, Settings -> General -> iPhone Storage says I can save 15.5 GiB because they’re backed up on iCloud, and if I use idevicebackup2 to pull everything off the phone, there are 21.7 gigs of photos

          I’m wondering if these discrepancies are related to the photo app not actually deleting pictures from the filesystem

            • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’d disregarded compression as a possibility because the wording is “full resolution photos and videos are safely stored in iCloud”

              • Jesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                There is lossless compression. Not saying that’s the cause of the varied number, but it is a common thing.

                • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  They’re already using HEIC/HEIF

                  I would be disappointed if they’re compressing it even more on iCloud. You can’t generally meaningfully compress a compressed file

                  • Jesus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    That’s not how lossless compression works. No data is lost.

                    For example, if you zip a folder of images, then unzip them, the pictures come out with their original sizes and structure. Zip is lossless.

                    Let’s use the analogy of a dish sponge.

                    Let’s pretend you wanted to make a dish sponge smaller. Lossy compression would make the sponge smaller by cutting off parts and throwing them away. Lossless would make it smaller by squish the sponge, and it would return to its normal shape once you stopped squishing it.