A bomb squad from Seinäjoki removed the explosives from the vehicles in the Ostrobothnian village.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    12 Kilos but a terrorist act was ruled out? Was he setting up a Wile E. Coyote defense?

    “Your honor, if this weren’t a hilarious prank why would I use so much explosive on one person? And if it’s not meant for pranks why was is so easy to order from the Acme Corporation?”

    • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No terrorism act being ruled out means police doesn’t have evidence or even suspect a terrorism motive. There is no separate “terrorism” singular statute for violent crimes. Rather Finland handles this by having qualifier for list of crimes of “crime act done in terroristic purpose”. One of these is explosives crimes. Illegal possession and so on.

      What specifying in article means is police has told they have no indication of terroristic purpose/motiv and thus the investigation will start regarding just “plain” explosives crimes, instead of starting investigation on “explosives crimes with terroristic purpose”. Basically initial show doesn’t show anything related to terrorism. The amount of explosives is itself irrelevant. Since the whole thing about the Finnish terrorism statute is about the motive and purpose, not the means.

      You could blow some single person with a whole metric ton of explosives and not be charged with terrorism. If you did it for say as crime of passion since they were having an affair with your spouse, that isn’t a terroristic murder with explosives. It’s just plain murder for personal reasons, just way over the top amount of explosives. You probably would get charged with public endangerment againt since that is awful big explosion and so on. However again… you didn’t endanger public for terroristic purposes so no terroristic crime label. You did it rather out of not caring/stupidity and so on.

      Also I would point out as result of couple big European wars and having a pretty sizeable mining industry, even large amount of explosives might be accessible to certain people. Which is why on the other hand authorities really take dim view on explosives crimes. He might not be suspected of terrorism, but I would think the person will get book thrown at them (as much as anyone gets book thrown at them in Finland) to make example. Prosecutor will must likely seek maximum jail sentence for that kind of pile of illegal explosives (whatever they were before, they certainly are illegal upon being put upon some randos car boot, which is not a legal way to store 12 kg of dynamite). Probably aggravated explosives crime at that again given it’s 12 kg of dynamite. You can make awful big crater with that amount.

  • Hubi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone knows the maximum amount of dynamite you can use for pranking is 10 kilos.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like a maniac shooting flaming arrows of death is one who deceives their neighbor and says, “I was only joking!”

    Proverbs 26:18-19