We say very clearly that rural America is hurting. But we refuse to justify attitudes that some scholars try to underplay.

Something remarkable happened among rural whites between the 2016 and 2020 elections: According to the Pew Research Centerā€™sĀ validated voter study, as the rest of the country moved away from Donald Trump, rural whites lurched toward him by nine points, from 62 percent to 71 percent support. And among the 100 counties where Trump performed best in 2016, almost all of them small and rural, he got a higher percentage of the vote in 91 of them in 2020. Yet Trumpā€™s extraordinary rural white supportā€”the most important story in rural politics in decadesā€”is something many scholars and commentators are reluctant to explore in an honest way.

ā€¦

What isnā€™t said enough is that rural whites are being told to blame all the wrong people for their very real problems. As we argue in the book, Hollywood liberals didnā€™t destroy the family farm, college professors didnā€™t move manufacturing jobs overseas, immigrants didnā€™t pour opioids into rural communities, and critical race theory didnā€™t close hundreds of rural hospitals. When Republican politicians and the conservative media tell rural whites to aim their anger at those targets, itā€™s so they wonā€™t ask why the people they keep electing havenā€™t done anything to improve life in their communities.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    Not really. One of the issues of the day was the colonial government preventing British people from ā€œsettlingā€ farther west, which of course would have meant settlers massacring the Indians who already lived there.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      7 months ago

      This was something the British wanted, but the colonial governments themselves were generally pro-settlement.