Him being unable to get the money is true and not ad hominem. Attacking him personally of too much tanner is. It is the same name calling that he loves to do. That pisses everyone here off so much. We can’t just get upset when it is done by people we disagree with.
How is it an ad hominem when it’s true?
Him being unable to get the money is true and not ad hominem. Attacking him personally of too much tanner is. It is the same name calling that he loves to do. That pisses everyone here off so much. We can’t just get upset when it is done by people we disagree with.