Fox News hostĀ Mark LevinĀ has called out billionaires for not payingĀ Donald Trumpā€™s legal bills after the former presidentā€™s legal team said paying his $400 millionĀ New York civil fraud penaltyĀ would be ā€œa practical impossibility.ā€

Trump is seeking a bond of $464 million to cover his fines and a stay in the execution of the monetary portion of the civil trial ruling after JudgeĀ Arthur EngoronĀ ruled in February that Trump must pay $355 million for committing fraud. The New York court held that Trump and top executives at The Trump Organization inflated the value of his assets to obtain more favorable terms from lenders and insurers. With interest, the full payment will be roughly $454 million. Trumpā€™s lawyers are appealing the verdict.

On Monday, theĀ RepublicanĀ suffered a setback after Trumpā€™s legal team admitted in a court filing that it is aĀ ā€œpractical impossibilityā€Ā for him to make the $464 million payment and requested a stay pending the outcome of an appeal process. His team had contactedĀ 33 companies to try to secure funding.

  • MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    8 months ago

    Even musk must know a bad business proposition Paying that bond will pit you directly in the cross hairs of various agencies

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      Yeahā€¦

      The same agencies that forced him to buy Twitter and trump will attack if he gets power.

      Musk is 100% dumb enough to foot the bill thinking if trump wins he gets it back, and gets more free reign to do what he wants without government interference.

      If he had the money, I legit wouldnā€™t be surprised if he put up some money.

      Like, you canā€™t rule out Musk or trump doing something because its irrational. Most of what they do is irrational

        • evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          That and owning the company that makes the only reusable rockets on Earth, I guess.

          Musk is a twat but you canā€™t deny that NASA is getting their moneyā€™s worth out of their contracts with SpaceX.

          2 billion doesnā€™t even pay for a single launch of SLS. And I wouldnā€™t be surprised to see Starship land on the moon (or at least impact the moon, lol) before the next launch of SLS.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I would be VERY surprised. And I NASA didnā€™t award blue origin a second moon lander contract because they have utmost faith in Starship/HLS.

            I will be first in line to say Falcon is an amazing piece of engineering, and Starlink is a great way to fund Falcon. Itā€™ll never turn a profit, but itā€™s an amazing way to turn venture capital into cheap rockets for everyone.

            But SpaceX has missed every single HLS deadline by a mile. Theyā€™ve got 2 more weeks to do their first unmanned moon landing, according to the original schedule. Itā€™ll take 12 (or 20?) successful launches to do 1 lunar landing and return, so Iā€™ll take this bet.

            The 2 billion contract was for HLS. It was originally higher, but Kathy Lueders gave SpaceX a call to lower their bid to just under the (previously undisclosed) limit, making them the only valid bid. Thatā€™s what the Blue Origin lawsuit was about, but the judge said it was legal for NASA to ā€œenter in negotiationsā€ with single parties, so this was allowed. You might recognise the name Kathy Leuders, because right after she handed SpaceX the contract, she quit NASA and got a job at SpaceX.

            I think Iā€™m validated in finding the whole HLS situation extremely concerning.

            • evranch@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              8 months ago

              I agree with you on HLS, the whole thing seems foolish. I meant more like SpaceX will chuck something around the moon for sport than that they would actually get HLS working. After all, SpaceX can already get to the moon, a lot of the recent payloads to the moon have flown on Falcon 9.

              The hardest part of getting to the moon is getting mass to orbit, and Starship just proved it could get mass to orbit, even if the reusable components didnā€™t work out. Now they just need to put Blue Originā€™s lander inside the payload bay with a kick stage to send it off to the moon šŸ˜‰ Doing a ton of refueling just to send an entire, oversized Starship as a lander makes no sense.