U.K. lawmakers expressed frustration Wednesday that funds from the sale of the Chelsea soccer club have not yet gone to support Ukrainian war victims as had been promised nearly two years ago by the former owner, Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich.

Abramovich sold Chelsea in 2022 after being sanctioned by the British government for what it called his enabling of Russia’s “brutal and barbaric invasion” of Ukraine.

He pledged to donate the £2.5 billion ($3.2 billion) from the sale to victims of the war. But almost 20 months later, the funds are still frozen in a bank account in an apparent disagreement with the British government over how they should be spent. The stalemate highlights the difficulty for Western governments to use frozen assets for Ukraine — even those that have been pledged by their owner.

“We are all completely baffled and frustrated that it has taken so long,” said Lord Peter Ricketts, chair of the European Affairs Committee in the upper chamber of the U.K. parliament, which produced the report.

“We can’t understand why either Abramovich or the British government didn’t ensure that there was more clarity in the original undertaking which … would avoid arguments about exactly who in Ukraine would get this money,” Ricketts said.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d support the self determination of ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine if they were to seek independence via referendum but instead they were infiltrated by Russian forces prior to referendum which in my opinion removes any semblance of legitimacy considering what might happen to you if you give an answer they do not like. The last time a legitimate referendum was held in Donbas and Luhansk both solidly voted for the independence of Ukraine. Even Crimea voted for independence by a thin margin in 1991.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not sure what the relevance of a referendum during the collapse of the Soviet Union is to the reality of the region being severely damaged for nearly a decade now.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s more relevant than a referendum performed under active occupation of a foreign invader

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s… also irrelevant? We’re talking about 8 years previous to that referendum. I’m pretty sure that referendum hadn’t even happened yet when Ambramovich’s assets were seized.

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Unmarked Russian forces were operating throughout Eastern Ukraine after Euromaidan. That Buk system that shot down the commercial airliner is a good example.