• rist097@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well most of the EU countries including France blocked all media channels from Russia

    • Holyginz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Media channels from Russia are basically just spouting putin propaganda so why would they want to be subjected to that?

      • rist097@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many countries are spewing propaganda bullshit, including and in majority coming from USA. I don’t think media channels from USA should be blocked.

        Switzerland is doing the right thing, they never blocked any news channel or limiting freedom of speech in that way.

        • Holyginz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Freedom of speech should never be given as an excuse for allowing hate speech, racism, bigotry, fascism or anything else on that vein a platform.

          • Famko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The paradox of tolerance is not taught to as many people as it should be.

          • rist097@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The problem comes when you let the government decide what is “hate speech, racism, bigotry, fascism”. It gives government too much power to control the opposition by censorship.

            • Holyginz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What, as apposed to corporations and companies like Twitter, Facebook and reddit? Lol

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What exactly do you propose to do about hate speech, racism, bigotry and fascism being spread on social media as propaganda, ignore it and hope no one sees it and gets radicalized? We’re already seeing people become terrorists after being radicalized by Internet media. and you would have us just hope we’re not in the line of fire when it happens again, I guess?

              • rist097@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                First of all, the USA is not the center of the world, the problems you guys have with mass shooting is not caused by the “hate speech”.

                And again banning hate speech is just masking the deeper institutional/educational problems you have, not solving them.

        • ElmerFudd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone born and raised in the USA, countries elsewhere absolutely should be blocking virtually all of our news media. We’re a toxic cesspool of entertainment/propaganda news, with an increasingly deadly end result for its consumers, and those around them.

          The agenda of the super rich relies very very heavily on our lying, greed-driven news media.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Uh huh.

      Please explain how preventing your citizens from using any social media & blocking an openly imperialistic county & known bad actor from propagandizing your citizens are similar.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bit different blocking a rouge nation and your own citizens.

      • rist097@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are blocking your own citizens to access the media. Meaning the government is actively curating the viewpoint to the citizens. Same like China is doing no?

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wtf does this have to do with some degenerate country’s right to shill their low intellect propaganda?

      • rist097@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same could be said for USA. Because the person above mentioned China, Iran, North Korea blocking media for political reasons. I mentioned that EU countries are doing the same. We should not have double standards.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If france wants to ban american propaganda, I am sure no american will shed a tear lol

          Everyone agree that’s the state has authority over foreign bad actor speach. We are discussing here state censoring their own citizen’s peach which is highly problematic esp in so called “democracies”

          • rist097@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If france wants to ban american propaganda, I am sure no american will shed a tear lol

            I strongly disagree. If they didn’t care they wouldn’t be buying media companies abroad.

            Everyone agree that’s the state has authority over foreign bad actor speach. We are discussing here state censoring their own citizen’s peach which is highly problematic esp in so called “democracies”

            Not everyone agrees. Allowing a government to decide who is a bad actor and ban the media is bad, that’s how countries fall into dictatorships and create narrative for their citizens. Just look at nazi Germany.

            • sadreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are clearly missing the point and don’t understand how the laws work.

              As always working nAzI GerManY into dicussion lol

              All countries permit the state to censor foreign speach… Most citizens accept this, censoring citizen speach is the issue.

              • rist097@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not every country has the same law, the fact that the law exists doesn’t mean its a good law.

                Its forbidden to mention nazi Germany? I guess we should just forget about it and let it happen again, because it hurts your argument.