You all remember just a few weeks ago when Sony ripped away a bunch of movies and TV shows people “owned”? This ad is on Amazon. You can’t “own” it on Prime. You can just access it until they lose the license. How can they get away with lying like this?

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s the best part

    They redefine “own” and “buy” in their TOS

    And so do many many other online retailers that sell digital goods

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wonder if that would hold in court. They could simply use “rent” or “lease” in their ads, but they purposely are trying to mislead to imply permanence.

    • AlteredStateBlob@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is modern alchemy trying to turn lead into gold. Just change the meaning of the magic words et voilá you make gold while the other party is robbed blind and can’t do anything about it after the fact.

      And of course, it’s totally legal and totally cool.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is exactly like physical media. You never owned it you bought a license to view it on that particular disk. But it also had limitations put on it.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          If license ownership rights with digital custodians were as good as they are with discs, there would be no conversation happening right now. The difference now is that custodians will occasionally snap a finger and disappear your stuff, and you have no recourse.

        • anonymouse@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s not “exactly like” physical media. The license portion is a similar concept. But the difference is that the variables that determine whether I can keep watching the content whenever I want, in perpetuity, lie solely with me as the person who physically possesses the media. The corporation from which I purchased the license can’t unilaterally decide to revoke my access to the content.