The case turns on the meaning of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, which bars those who had taken an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States” from holding office if they then “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

  • NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Of course they’re gonna say yes. They don’t need any death threats from a bunch of lunatics, there are too many billionaire funded luxury vacations to be had. They don’t have time for such nonsense.

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      But wouldn’t that mean anyone with pending felony charges can run for office? Or can they already? I guess you are innocent until proven guilty. But is it a states right to decide who they put in the ballot? But didn’t we fight a war to say that the states have to follow federal laws? But so many states already have laws that contradict federal laws. Man the US government is whack.