• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    They were attacking commercial vessels. Military has none of those.

    Do you even know what the word “literally” means?

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Terrorists attack commercial ships, US responds to protect them, they attack US ship.

      Yes, literally.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Ok, you clearly either don’t or you think commercial and military are distinctions without meaning. Either way, I’m done with your wilfully obtuse ass. Have the year you deserve.

        • Quokka@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Attacks were directed at US Navy ships responding to distress calls from merchant vessels, of which the 157 signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea have an obligation to provide aid to.

          Not to mention SOLAS and UN maritime security obligations.

          But hey, random on the Internet who wants to support brutal authoritarianism knows better than the global community dedicated to helping protect people. Go run off and hide now.