Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) bashed former President Trump online and said Christians who support him ā€œdonā€™t understandā€ their religion.

ā€œIā€™m going to go out on a NOT limb here: this man is not a Christian,ā€ Kinzinger said on X, formerly known as Twitter, responding to Trumpā€™s Christmas post. ā€œIf you are a Christian who supports him you donā€™t understand your own religion.ā€

Kinzinger, one of Trumpā€™s fiercest critics in the GOP, said in his post that ā€œTrump is weak, meager, smelly, victim-ey, belly-achey, but he ainā€™t a Christian and heā€™s not ā€˜Godā€™s man.ā€™ā€

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, and then youā€™ve got things like the virgin birth which features in a lot of religions. Plus as it grew more popular, it took over some pagan traditions as well.

    Iā€™m not sure what the latest scholarly consensus is on if he even existed or not, but if he did, he wasnā€™t born around Christmas. The date was chosen to match a pagan holiday.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Scholary consensus is that he did exist however scholary consensus is that the resurrection was a true event and a man named Mark wrote the first gospel. So yeah turns out the majority of people who make a living studying the Bible believe in accuracy of the Bible, big surprise.

      I prefer to look at evidence and see where it goes.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        I guess it would come down to what historians in general think. Although part of that also requires us to know the historians religions.