• Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t understand why the article writes that iMessage is the only way for encrypted messaging between Android and iOS. I can thing of several off the top of my head:

    • Matrix
    • Signal
    • WhatsApp
    • Facebook Messanger (very soon)
    • Threema
    • Telegram
    • Viber
    • Line
    • Skype

    And there are surly more …

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Most of those are proprietary. My list:

      • Matrix
      • Session
      • Signal and signal clients
      • Simplex Chat
      • Jami
      • Briar
      • Nextcloud talk (needs nextcloud)
      • probably a lot more
      • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I assume that if people are too lazy to switch to a solution which works for every one then they are not very interested in talking to you anyway.

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Except it’s not a solution that works for everyone. It’s 9 solutions. If it were one it would be a lot easier.

          7 once you take out the ones owned by Facebook.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      telegram is not encrypted by default, and does its best to make you forget to enable it for each individual contact. if you want to do a group chat, you’re out of luck.

      Telegram is only (partially) secure for pedantic power users, which most people aren’t.

        • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          so, relative to pretty much all other messaging services, it might as well not be.

          You’re saying “by default not everyone can read your messages, only you, the recipient, telegram themselves and anyone who they might decide to share them with, with neither your consent, nor knowledge”

          When compared to “nobody except you and the recipient” that becomes effectively equivalent to “nothing”.

          also, not end-to-end ever when it comes to group chats