ā€œThe resolution suggests that all anti-Zionismā€”it statesā€”is antisemitism. Thatā€™s either intellectually disingenuous or just factually wrong,ā€ said New York Representative Jerry Nadler, who voted present. ā€œThe authors if they were at all familiar with Jewish history & culture should know about Jewish anti-Zionism that was and is expressly not antisemitic. This resolution ignores the fact that even today, certain Orthodox Hasidic Jewish communities ā€¦ have held views that are at odds with the modern Zionist conception.ā€

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    11 months ago

    This you, apologist?

    How do you get rid of Israel without killing a lot of Jewish people?

    Geeā€¦ I wonder what the correct term would be for someone who peddles apologetics for a white supremacist settler-colonialist state?

    Donā€™t help meā€¦ itā€™s on the tip of my tongue.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      11 months ago

      How is that apologetics? Thereā€™s a fucking war, and Israel is currently engaged in a genocide against Palestinians, and Hamas is using their deaths to fundraise for their next terrorist attack. How do you end the ethno-state without violence? I donā€™t know how we get there.

      Why am I even bothering with you. Youā€™re clearly more interested in labeling me to feel superior than you are in being honest about the problem.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        11 months ago

        Israel is currently engaged in a genocide against Palestinians

        Oh, youā€™ve only noticed that now - thanks to Hamasā€™ attack, eh? What did you think Israel has been doing since 1949, Clyde?

        their next terrorist attack.

        Do tellā€¦ what differentiates you from the people who labelled the ANC ā€œterroristsā€ back in the 80s? Or the people who labelled the Viet Cong ā€œterroristsā€ back in the 70s? Or the people who labelled Jim Brown a ā€œterroristā€ back when the Antebellum South was still a thing?

        Sorry, Clyde - but itā€™s a loaded question. We both know the answer to that one.