• Jo@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I doubt he’s ignoring anything. And I know nothing but I think it’s a little unfair to bash him for this.

    Meta does not need the Fediverse to create a ready-populated instance all of its own. It doesn’t need to federate with anyone, it can probably kill Twitter and Reddit with a single stone (if it pours enough resource into moderating and siloing). Just stick a fediwidget in every logged in account page with some thoughtful seeding of content and it’s done.

    The danger of federating with Meta is much the same as not federating. It has such a massive userbase it will suck the lifeblood out of everywhere else whether or not it can see us.

    The possible silver lining is that there are other very large corporates which can do the same (some of which have said they plan to). We could all end up with multiple logins on corporate instances simply because we have accounts with them for other reasons. And that means a lot of very large instances with name recognition, and easy access, making it much harder for any of them to stop federation and keep their users to themselves.

    Being federated with one or more behemoths might well be hell. Some instances won’t do it. Moderation standards will be key for those that do. But multiple federated behemoths can hold each other hostage because their users can all jump ship to the competition so easily.

    This is much, much more complicated than just boycott or not. They cannot be trusted one tiny fraction of an inch but this is coming whether we like it or not. We need to work out how to protect ourselves and I’m starting to think that encouraging every site with a user login to make the fediverse a widget on their account pages might be the very best way to do it.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s a little unfair to bash him for this.

      I don’t. He would not have agreed to Facebook’s NDA unless he was planning to sell the Fediverse out.

      • tikitaki@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        there’s an argument that it’s better to know rather than not know. i understand the ideological stand against Meta and everything it stands for, but it’s easy to judge from the outside looking in. we don’t know what he knows

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Knowing is useless if you’re contractually obligated not to act on that knowledge. When the devil offers you a deal, you say no, because nothing good can come of it.

    • Sanchokan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Suposing multiple big platforms join the fediverse and play nice, what stops them from feeding ads to other instances?