• Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    In the UK, maybe other places, apple still has to use normal sim cards. All except that Air, because it just cant. Theres no room. I might have given the phone a shot, if I could have just popped my sim in and took it for a spin. But with having to fuck about with esims, the answer was no.

    I wouldnt say no to a new mini though…

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The price is off. It’s more expensive than the base model but with worse specs. If someone is willing to pay more, they’ll get the pro, not the air.

      • valkyre09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Me too buddy, there are dozens of us! Lol. The air happens to fit my needs perfectly. I want a thin and light phone, don’t really use my camera and battery usage is fine. I can totally appreciate if somebody is a heavy user this phone isn’t for them.

        As for the price, yup it’s expensive. Feels like holding a piece of jewellery, and that’s nice.

        • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s totally fine that you both like it and I’m not saying it’s a bad phone at all. It’s certainly very beautiful, probably feels nice in the hand and is overall a competent iPhone with just less camera. But most people are looking at the price, compare it to the other models and see that it just doesn’t make sense. It’s a pure luxury product that is still cheaper than a Pro so who exactly is the audience?

  • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    A thin phone is kinda cool, who actually needs that? And because of the humongous camera bulge it’s not that thin anyway.

    • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Apple offers 7 years of of ios updates, how about a battery large enough that it is still usable after a few years of use.

      • Logh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I used my 8 plus (or whatever the flagship was at that time) for 8 years and for 7.5 years the battery was fine. In the last six months I had some issues when it died before the alarm went off, hence the new device. I do miss the fingerprint reader and 3D touch though.

      • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Biggest selling point of Ultra watches and Pro phones. People are tired of constipated battery specs from Apple and releasing a phone which worsen this aspect was going to fail miserably… it doesn’t have even 1/10 of the wow factor to succeed with the trade offs it brings

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      if this was my year to upgrade i might have gotten one. I use a magsafe wallet which evens out the back with the camera bulge.

      99% of my days the battery would probably be sufficient, but if I’m going on a trip or whatever I can use a magsafe charger. You can’t do the opposite with a thick phone; you’re just carrying unnecessary bulk every single day.

      the main issue for me is the price. I like the idea, but I’m not sure how much of a premium I want to pay for it, if any.

      • Elkenders@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The bulk is genuinely noticeable to you? The original iPhone feels bulky? I’m not being facetious, I’m intrigued that there are people who felt the current iPhone design is too bulky.

    • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Think of the inventory space from unsold Airs could have been spared without the bump! Apple logistics in shambles

    • MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Apple needs it. So people break their devices even easier and have to spend more money.

  • realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remembered posting that I wondered who the hell would buy this. Now I know it’s exactly who I thought.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    You mean a bad economy and poor pay for the average worker compounds into a worse economy?

  • geoff@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I actually really liked it when I tried, so I got one. I realized that I do want a phone that makes its presence more lightly known.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I want that too but just make it smaller. I don’t want a giant screen burning through battery and just thinner by taking away battery. Work on x and y first, then maybe z.

        • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          With how much we depend on the phone for everything, I need a phone that covers 99% of the days, not just the average.

          For being in the office working, 90 min of active usage gets me to the next charger.

          What about going it’s out with the family, taking lots of photos and videos, using the maps+GPS…?

          Also, battery degrades. One that barely covers today will be lacking in 1.5 years. Small battery is a form of planned obsolesce.

    • anarcho_vroom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m genuinely curious. How does this fit your normal usage? Does the bulk under the camera not negate the thin body?

      I guess, could you just expand on your thought.

      • geoff@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s much lighter both in my pocket and my hands. It feels much less obtrusive in a pocket overall despite the bump, which when holding it one-handed can sometimes even be an affordance that keeps it from slipping.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        the vast majority of people put cases around their phones which eliminates the camera protrusion. If you do use a case with an Air, it’ll still be thinner than the other iphone options.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know “who is this for?” and “what would Steve Jobs say?” are tired memes, but… still. An even thinner body? Really?

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bend gate 2.0 with a crappy battery for too much money.

    Gee, I wonder why they aren’t selling?

      • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        That may be so, but perception is reality. Nobody trusts it. The first thing everyone thinks is “that’s going to bend”. It doesn’t need to be true to sway people’s purchase.

              • edwardbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                yeah, like who the fuck wants a phone with 60% battery of what a MUCH cheaper phone has?

                jerryrig battle tested that phone, and sure, props to Apple for building it so tough. but nobody cares about a thin unbreakable phone.