Anyone know if this is true or not?

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 小时前

    You haven’t demonstrated what harm comes from googling naked girl and seeing boobs.

    If you want devices with parental control you will need to pay for them.

    Devices like school computers already have such. This won’t stop a determined person from borrowing their friends phone and googling naked girl but that is a reasonable trade off honestly.

    I don’t want to turn the entire Internet into 1984 so your kids doesn’t see boobs until he’s 18

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 小时前

      You haven’t demonstrated what harm comes from googling naked girl and seeing boobs.

      I cannot, since I am not a researcher. The research is out there though.

      If you want devices with parental control you will need to pay for them.

      If it is definitively negative, parents should not have to research, install, and pay for such restrictions onky to be easily avoided on another device.

      I don’t want to turn the entire Internet into 1984 so your kids doesn’t see boobs until he’s 18

      I don’t have kids. This about an entire generation and all future ones. Have you read 1984? While sueveillance is a part of it, it’s largely about authoritarianism and the control of reality itself. Being ID’d for a porn site is not that. 1984 is already happening, and the porn has nothing to do with it. Regardless, you have made no comment on the idea that I want it done with zero knowledge proof. The site would know nothing about you except you are over 18. There is absolutely nothing 1984 about that