abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 17 天前What's it like being a user hearing about developer drama.lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1841arrow-down19
arrow-up1832arrow-down1imageWhat's it like being a user hearing about developer drama.lemmy.blahaj.zoneabbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 17 天前message-square87linkfedilink
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·16 天前Slic3r? Original Slic3r? Why are you still using that?
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·16 天前It takes longer to configure a newer slicer than to test if the old one works in wayland :) When I need something more advanced, like customized supports, I’ll migrate. Didn’t happen yet.
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·16 天前variable width extrusions are great, you can get a whole lot more detail in thin areas just automatically now There’s also tree supports (usually less material and much easier to design for and remove), lightning infill (weak infill for non-structural models) maybe some other features that i’m forgetting
minus-squareDamage@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·16 天前Forget features, just the basic path generator is so much better in the newer variants
Slic3r? Original Slic3r? Why are you still using that?
It takes longer to configure a newer slicer than to test if the old one works in wayland :)
When I need something more advanced, like customized supports, I’ll migrate. Didn’t happen yet.
variable width extrusions are great, you can get a whole lot more detail in thin areas just automatically now
There’s also tree supports (usually less material and much easier to design for and remove), lightning infill (weak infill for non-structural models)
maybe some other features that i’m forgetting
Forget features, just the basic path generator is so much better in the newer variants