Kevin McCarthyā€™s speakership ended as it beganā€”in chaos. Unprepared to build coalitions, unwilling to stand firm against the crazies in his own caucus, and, ultimately, unable to count votes at the moment when vote counting mattered most, the California Republican was deposed on Tuesday amid a cacophony of threats, insults, accusations, and whining.

So how did House Republicans propose to address the most serious leadership crisis they have experienced since their ill-conceived attempt to remove Bill Clinton blew up a quarter century ago on scandal-plagued House Speaker Newt Gingrich and his hapless successor, adulterous Louisiana Republican Robert Livingston?

As of Thursday morning, two peopleā€”House majority leader Steve Scalise and House Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordanā€”have declared their candidacy for the speakership. But some House Republicans are pushing an even more chaotic prospect: Speaker of the House Donald Trump.

Within hours of the Houseā€™s 216-210 vote to vacate McCarthyā€™s speakership, Texas Republican Troy Nehls declared, ā€œThis week, when the US House of Representatives reconvenes, my first order of business will be to nominate Donald J Trump for speaker of the US House of Representatives. President Trump, the greatest president of my lifetime, has a proven record of putting America first and will make the House great again.ā€

Even by the unusually high levels of political obsequiousness that are observed when Republican members of Congress start talking about Trump, Nehlsā€™s announcement stood out by blending desperate hints of tragedy and farce. So, of course, Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene decided to outdo him, posting a picture on Wednesday of Trump wearing an outsize ā€œMake America Great Againā€ cap and wielding the House gavel. ā€œThis is my choice for speaker of the House!ā€ announced Greene.

Other House Republicans jumped into the ā€œTrump for speakerā€ clown car, and by Tuesday night, Fox News host Sean Hannity was reporting, ā€œSources telling me at this hour some House Republicans have been in contact with and have started an effort to draft former president Donald Trump to be the next Speaker, and I have been told that President Trump might be open to helping the Republican Party, at least in the short term, if necessary.ā€

Trump dubbed the prospect ā€œinteresting.ā€

ā€œLots of people have been calling me about speaker, all I can say is weā€™ll do whatever is best for the country and for the Republican Party,ā€ Trump said Wednesday morning. Pressed to clarify whether he might actually serve as speaker for the remainder of the 118th Congress, Trump said he was ā€œtotally focusedā€ on his 2024 presidential bid. But then he added, ā€œIf I can help them during the process, Iā€™ll do it.ā€

Was Trump saying heā€™d take a temporary speakership? Maybe. Maybe not.

It didnā€™t matter to Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Somewhere in the word salad that was served up by the former president, Ramaswamyā€”who has urged House Republicans to ask themselves, ā€œIs chaos really such a bad thing?ā€ā€”heard what he wanted to hear. Of the prospect that Trump might be given the gavel and control of the House, Ramaswamy declared on Wednesday, ā€œThis isnā€™t crazy. We need to shake things up in there.ā€

Actually, it is crazy, for a variety of reasons. But one reason is particularly worthy of consideration.

While itā€™s true that someone who is not a member of the House can serve as speaker, Trump is currently barred from holding the position. Who says? The House Republican Conference.

According to the Conference Rules of the 118th Congress, ā€œIf a member of Elected Republican Leadershipā€¦publicly announces his or her intention to seek other elected office in Federal, state, or local government, that Member shall resign from such leadership position.ā€

Trump is an announced presidential candidate. So he is precluded by his own partyā€™s rule from serving as speaker.

    • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      A party based on disruption, destruction and mayhem having no interest in actually governing and instead plunging the nation into chaos?

      Yup. Completely expected.