• CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I really don’t think so. Many of the countries you think of as more democratic have a Monarch as head of State, because it’s understood between the Monarch and the people that if the Monarch steps out of line, the people will recognize it as obvious and kill them.

    A dictator isn’t as obvious and as we see in the US, they change shit under your nose and their end goal isn’t as obvious as a Monarch’s, so many in the population don’t recognize their intentions as being a power grab (sound familiar?). A Monarch undermining democracy is obviously wanting power back, a dictator? Well they could just be ā€œDoing it for the good of the people šŸ¤Ŗā€. Most people aren’t stupid enough to fall for a Monarch saying they are grabbing power ā€œFor the good of the peopleā€, but are stupid enough to fall for a politician saying this, since they believe a politician is ā€œOne of themā€ (as they ignorantly believe all politicians come from their class; the peasantry). A Monarch was, is and never will be ā€œOne of usā€, they were obviously never peasants, so less people fall for the BS.