renzev@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoYou just gotta think differentlemmy.worldimagemessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down170
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageYou just gotta think differentlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square192fedilink
minus-squareqjkxbmwvz@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoFor some (most?) of us, we don’t have ssh access open to the world, so everything is over a VPN. So I can just use NFS over WireGuard which afaik is fairly secure, if you trust your endpoints, and works great over the Internet.
minus-squarecmnybo@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoI’ve never had good luck with NFS on a high latency connection. SSHFS still works fine even if the server is on the other side of the planet.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoNFS should work well enough on high latency connections - it was designed back when it was fairly uncommon to connect to a server over dial-up. It’s definitely possible that SFTP is more optimized than NFS though.
For some (most?) of us, we don’t have ssh access open to the world, so everything is over a VPN. So I can just use NFS over WireGuard which afaik is fairly secure, if you trust your endpoints, and works great over the Internet.
I’ve never had good luck with NFS on a high latency connection. SSHFS still works fine even if the server is on the other side of the planet.
NFS should work well enough on high latency connections - it was designed back when it was fairly uncommon to connect to a server over dial-up.
It’s definitely possible that SFTP is more optimized than NFS though.