The Trump Organization is trying to determine the sweep of Tuesdayās ruling that Donald Trump is liable for fraud and what it means for the future of the former presidentās namesake business, his attorneys say.
At a pre-trial hearing Wednesday, Trump attorneys said they didnāt know to which part of the company the ruling applied and were starting to work out what may need to be dissolved to comply with the judgeās surprise decision.
Officials from New York Attorney General Letitia Jamesā office also said they needed more time to go through the order.
The fraud case āchanged significantly since yesterday,ā New York Judge Arthur Engoron said in court Wednesday, referring to his stunning ruling where he found Trump and his adult sons liable for fraud and canceled the Trump Organizationās business certification.
The difference between claiming data and not is that Iām agreeing that your points have merit. Youāre ignoring mine.
I have provided examples. You havenāt disproved them, youāve disregarded the .
Neither of yoir links show my opinion as false. They reinforce your assertion, which I agree with but they donāt quantify it.
No I mean every country worldwide. Those with more or less holiday pay. Those with more or less voting restrictions.
Lol, so people vote more when they think itās important. The corraly is that they vote less when they think it is less important. Also called apathy. Which state do you think has the least gerrymandering and voter suppression?
First Iāve heard of you agreeing. And no, Iām not ignoring your baseless claims, Iām calling them out for being baseless. Itās a significant difference.
You have provided arguments, not examples.
I also havenāt disproven that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit.
You canāt prove a negative. I refer you back to the teapot.
Theyāre imperical proof that the things I claim actually happen. That they donāt quantify it doesnāt imply that your unproven claims must be true.
All well-functioning democracies have better facilitation of voting than the US and higher voter participation. That they have both of those things in common is no coincidence.
Thatās an interpretation ignoring a ton of known data in favor of your unproven hypothesis. Ever hear of confirmation bias?
I have no idea and thatās fine since itās irrelevant.
Ah, so itās a comprehension problem. Well, no point wasting my time then.
The point of asking for the least gerrymandered state was to show the differences in a state of your choosing, without me cherrypicking data.
The fact that they donāt quantify it is my point. Youre making assertions of fact without the data to back it up. Iām pointing to flaws in your data and offering examples that show your assertions are incorrect.