Volodymyr Ariel, a close ally of Poroshenko, says that far from becoming a new Winston Churchill, Zelenskyy had failed to unite the nation. “Simply put, Zelenskyy has not become a true leader,” he says. “He is unable to adapt to the challenges Ukraine faces today. He remains selfish, narcissistic and arrogant in his dealing both within Ukraine and with international partners.”
Then Russia will probably occupy the entire country. Ukraine won’t have anything to fight with, as NATO can’t supply them with the quantity needed, and even then, they’d lose to a much larger, motivated army. They simply can’t compete militarily.
Seems unlikely given that western Ukraine has a lot of anti-Russian sentiment. The most plausible scenario is that Russia will absorb parts of Ukraine that are pro Russian or neutral, and the rest will be gobbled up by Poland and Romania.
Well, that the desired result, but if peace negotiations fail, and the EU keeps arming the Nazi’s in Kiev, the Russians will have no choice but to devastate the entire country including Kiev, and any other metro area and leave nothing left. Let’s hope it doesn’t come to this, but like the US president said, Kiev has no winning cards to play here. But the clowns in Kiev hate Russia so much with EU support that I’ve got my fingers crossed.
They still don’t need to take over all of Ukraine though. They will break the AFU fighting capacity, and then leave western Ukraine to become Europe’s problem I imagine. At that point, Europe is gonna be stuck with a non viable state that will require billions to prop up, and if they don’t do that then they’re gonna have a huge refugee crisis on their hands. Millions of Ukrainian nationalists, who will feel betrayed, flooding in is really the worst possible case scenario for Europe.
I bet a small portion of the country will remain Ukrainian, but only because no one else is going to willingly add Chernobyl to their country.
It’s basically a wildlife preserve at this point https://theconversation.com/chernobyl-has-become-a-refuge-for-wildlife-33-years-after-the-nuclear-accident-116303