This is the new flavor of lazy journalism. How many headlines do you see like “Senator X SLAMS so and so in a FURIOUS conversation” and then you click through and there’s some mundane talk in congress. Or, “So and so has a MELTDOWN live in front of blah blah” and same thing. This article takes something that is probably not good (scientists leaving the US), picks a single example and then makes a case that this is generalized.
The way this makes me feel is that if I go to the ice cream stand and watch a child accidentally drop their ice cream, then go home and pen “ICE CREAMS being DROPPED all over the US! Can this happen to you?”
Basically, instead of real journalism we get clickbait. The linked article isn’t the worst example of this, however, it’s a trend that has frustrated me to no end.
Barely anyone is actually a researcher at an university. Science is a pyramid scheme in a sense and everyone cut away to form the top is someone selling their soul to the industry as an engineer. Hence actual numbers are small in every field of research.
You don’t get my meaning. I’m saying, a single university established this policy, and is getting these results. It’s a pilot project that proves the viability of the strategy, and sets an example that can be followed by many many others.
40…is not a lot
This is the new flavor of lazy journalism. How many headlines do you see like “Senator X SLAMS so and so in a FURIOUS conversation” and then you click through and there’s some mundane talk in congress. Or, “So and so has a MELTDOWN live in front of blah blah” and same thing. This article takes something that is probably not good (scientists leaving the US), picks a single example and then makes a case that this is generalized.
The way this makes me feel is that if I go to the ice cream stand and watch a child accidentally drop their ice cream, then go home and pen “ICE CREAMS being DROPPED all over the US! Can this happen to you?”
Basically, instead of real journalism we get clickbait. The linked article isn’t the worst example of this, however, it’s a trend that has frustrated me to no end.
I personally know three people who are moving. All engineers. All queer.
43 people is more than 40, but not a lot
That’s people I personally know. Not from academia or industry.
Barely anyone is actually a researcher at an university. Science is a pyramid scheme in a sense and everyone cut away to form the top is someone selling their soul to the industry as an engineer. Hence actual numbers are small in every field of research.
That’s at a single university.
Which is the only one that the article mentioned as offering. Blame the article if you think the numbers are bigger and they didn’t bother mentioning.
You don’t get my meaning. I’m saying, a single university established this policy, and is getting these results. It’s a pilot project that proves the viability of the strategy, and sets an example that can be followed by many many others.