• Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, they’re not.

    Don’t equate those two tiny organisations to the ridiculously wealthy and powerful companies like Alphabet, Apple and so on.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mozilla made layoffs and budget cuts to their non-profit foundation. Actions speak louder than words, and I’m not holding my breath.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly, this feels like one of those things you see in politics where someone claims that because one group is slightly bad then they’re just as bad as the incredibly bad obviously evil alternative. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good, and don’t get the doomers drag you down to their level!

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right. It’s just that Mozilla gets a lot of money from … checks notes … facepalm. So they’re worse!

      • Zacryon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        So that Google is the default search engine in Firefox. … Which you can easily change.

        Oh no… they’re such an evil big tech company!!1!! /s smh

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          So that Google is the default search engine in Firefox. … Which you can easily change.

          That’s actually funny, becase people often claim that Chrome dominance is due to “defaults”. So, defaults aren’t a biggie now?

  • Rooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still use firefox ( and any fork of it ) rather than use any differently coloured chromium ( including brave, their ceo does not have a good reputation too )

    • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I understand that Brave is a very good browser, from a technical standpoint, but it just feels annoying. For one, the constant crypto advertisement is a real turn off.

      Firefox is also the only real mobile browser that lets me have extensions, so I can use stuff like uBlock or BypassPaywall.

      • Rooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah in the terms of Bullshitification, firefox is still far of any chromium stuff.

        I will never forget what brave did with their crypto sh*t in their browser.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Either you take the easy way and try to be sustainable my making deals with… let me check… Google (and now selling users’ data), or you try to be creative, although not perfect.

      • brrt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        We could have better conversations if we stopped the hyperboles. Constant crypto ads? You can turn off ever seeing their wallet and other stuff in settings.

  • sturlabragason@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Let’s be realistic; afaik there’s no realistic alternative to Firefo(rk)x or any of the Chromium flavors. Also, expecting the 1% to behave any differently would be naive.

    This wouldn’t be the first time we’re in a bleak place where it comes to our digital landscape, hopefully we’ll be in a better place soon.

    https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3f62dcbf-ae36-4bf9-96f1-325db2914835.gif

  • Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Didn’t know that “standing again” meant "taking money from them to strengthen their search engine dominance ". At least for one of these companies.

  • HStone32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Challenge: Lemmy users must express their shared interests separably from their politics. Difficulty: impossible

    • gjoel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh no, people who are enthusiastic about privacy and open source don’t want to support fascists! How can it be so?