I want to start a discussion of MIT vs GPL and see what you all think

  • Ferk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But it being MIT also makes it easy for the company to just work internally by themselves to make improvements for their version of the software without paying anything at all to the original dev. They can even release a better product than the original dev using his own changes and unfairly compete against them without sharing anything back.

    Whereas, if the license is GPL, they would need to hire the original dev and colaborate with him fairly if they ever want to make a proprietary version of the software (which can be done, as long as the dev is the sole copyright holder).

    • Hexorg@beehaw.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes I wasn’t arguing that MIT>GPL I was instead identifying the source of GPL’s challenges in hopes to find a solution for those challenges.