Summary

The Supreme Courtā€™s handling of a case involving Trumpā€™s firing of Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, has been described as a ā€œcompromise.ā€

Dellinger sued, claiming unlawful termination. The court, facing a split between conservative and liberal justices, opted to ā€œnot decide,ā€ holding the governmentā€™s appeal ā€œin abeyanceā€ until the temporary restraining order (TRO) expires.

This ā€œnonrulingā€ risks escalating executive vs. judicial tensions, as it provides no clear direction on presidential removal power.

While TROs remain an option, the court avoided directly challenging Trumpā€™s claims, leading to potential future clashes.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    8 days ago

    This. The Judicial system in a liberal democracy serves to depoliticize outcomes. This is currently repurposed to depoliticize a fascist takeover.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      8 days ago

      Astute and elegantly said. Iā€™ll definitely be repeating that observation.