Summary

Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner refused to sign a statement saying Donald Trump was not antisemitic, according to Michael Wolff’s new book “All or Nothing.”

The couple previously served as senior advisers but distanced themselves after the January 6 attack.

Wolff claims Trump sought their “Jewish cover” following his ambiguous stance on Israel post-October 7 Hamas attacks.

Kushner dodged repeated requests for a formal endorsement, eventually declining to label Trump as non-antisemitic.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    Jared got his money from the Saudis and now has no use for Trump. Donnie threw Ivanka’s mom in a hole in the ground to get a tax break. Loyalty runs in that clan.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    (negative)n in title, i’m lost again.

    Let's disentangle this mess :

    Statement “A” :
    Trump ≠ (anti-semitic = Hate_Jews™)
    //
    (( Ivanka Trump + Jared Kushner →
    Trump’s relatives )) . (refused to sign ≈ deny ) . (“A”)

    Trump’s relatives (deny he does not) hate Jews //(in memo that is in book)

    .
    Trump’s relatives : “He hates Jews”.

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Once again i struggle understanding a simple English sentence. please help me :

        (…) who part computer.

        1st interpretation would be written differently for me … i would write it like :
        “for those who are part human, part computer” so i would have to reject that one.

        2nd interpretation would be reading “part” as a verb … like dividing something into parts. So : “taking a computer into many pieces”

        Since I’m not sure how this second interpretation works, i start doubting my capacity and believe there might be a third interpretation …

          • A_A@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Oh ! … i get it thanks. Very surprised, i am though that so many users are contributing to such an old and insignificant tread …

      • A_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        i don’t know. Maybe this is what happens when reading English through a French mind.

        • childOfMagenta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Same structure as in french, no? Ils refusent de signer un mémo qui dit que trump n’est pas antisémite.

          • A_A@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago
            en français :

            D’accord peut-être que la structure est la même … mais étant donné que j’ai de la difficulté à comprendre l’anglais, souvent je dois décomposer les phrases et les recomposer … c’est ce que j’ai dû faire dans le présent cas.

            .

            inN enngrishh :

            Well ok maybe, but but but … i struggle understanding English since i was born french … so sometimes i have to, (like this once), decompose and recompose sentences to get ze meaning.