there isnt so much incentive. No advertisement. Upvote counters behave weirdly in the fediverse (from what i can see).

dont blame me for the opinions of someone else. Just note how hipocritical you sound by dismissing criticism of the us while criticizing russia. Why not both?

your conditions are too specific. what the US did to Iraq, Vietnam, Korea,… is already bad enough. But these dont qualify because they arent neighbors of the us, and the intentions arent exactly what you listed. still, these are already bad enough.

plus it was another data point for profiling people based on their browser settings.

looking at these is disturbing me a little

I see, so you see it not an actual state we may achieve, but rather the negation of present authorities and systems.

So as long as an organization is truly democratic, it can be considered anarchist?

For example, if one person likes to make coca cola but as a side effect he pollutes a river that the rest of the group wants to keep clean. The group may decide democratically to force him to not make coca cola. I would call this a goverment-like organization, even though it does not need to have a leader to fulfill its goal.

That’s the [any country] National Motto!

…i suppose

excuse my ignorance, but ive always wondered this about anarchism: Seems to me that people gather and organize themselves to reach common goals. How can these organizations not become governments? is that actually possible?

escalations are escalations, justifiable or not.

you’re tripping. third world countries arent some lawless wastelands full of hopeless zombies like you seem to imagine.