You can find this on the album Inside Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry was asked to give an example of network notes. For context, just know Gene was a Humanist. He framed The Bible as if it was the script for a television show. Everything pretty much would have been deemed inappropriate.

I know we tease people in modern times who would criticize Jesus of Nazareth for how he has been historically known, but it is wild how a religious text would not been deemed acceptable for 60s or 70s television.

Since when is baking soda a liquid?

Excuse me but us Asians have been using air fryers since the 90s.

I must be mistaken. I thought the EU had made it illegal. Finland is part of the EU last I checked.

How about chaotic chaotic? I do four of these randomly.

In this context I would immediately suspect they are a stalker.

I’ve seen a British comedy that had this as a joke. But the movie was a sleezebag of a comedy. All about a dude that works at a grocery story at night, gains the ability to freeze time and messes with the women he sees shopping. I am glad I can’t remember the title.

What if I wanted a specific broom?

I know FIFA is corrupt but does anyone not see how dangerous traveling to the United States currently is?

You linked the same article from the post.

I’m sure they looked at Indian government and figured since they routinely discriminate the Muslim population he was in the clear.

Does this person not understand how dates work?

Ball peen clearly.

Might as well blame the British for this fuck fest. They started this.

In practice he would have to be celibate.

What’s the matter? Don’t you like me? I’m your girl?

Harvard is still 100% in the wrong here. Treating all speech critical of the Israeli state as antisemitism is not the same as hatred for the Jewish people.

Like I said, just 1%. I should have said it wouldn’t be good if CPB grants stopped coming. I’m just more upset that the direct line of attack misunderstands what is really happening. These organizations are very important. To blatantly say Congress funds them isn’t just incorrect but potentially harmful to how other organizations that rely on outside money are treated.

Off the top of my head I don’t know if PBS (likely the same as NPR) but NPR is not funded by fucking Congress!!! You fucking idiots don’t know what Congress does or does not fund. NPR gets grants from CPB (Corporation for Public Broadcasting) which was created by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, which LBJ signed into law. CPB only accounts for 1% of NPR’s annual budget.

If the dumbass wants something legitimate to complain about, then complain about what CPB gives grants for.

EDIT: I realize the article mentions CPB, and I clearly wrote this before reading it. My point stands. Congress does not allocate any money directly to either NPR or PBS. If these cultural institutions are going to be attacked by clueless people, someone better be explaining what they got wrong.

Uh… I regret this.

Little Saddie… in the ass.